Politico reported on the possible cancellation in the United States of the court decision on the right to abortion

A 1973 court decision legalized abortion at the federal level and removed the power of states to prohibit abortions. Now the Supreme Court can rule

The U.S. Supreme Court may vote to overturn the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling that guaranteed constitutional protection for the right to abortion at the federal level. The court may also oppose the 1992 Planned Parenthood v. Casey decision, which upheld the main message of the 1973 court decision.

Roe v. Wade was heard in the 1970s in Texas. The plaintiff was Norma McCorvey under the pseudonym Jane Rowe. She filed a lawsuit in the district court, as the laws of Texas at that time did not allow her to have an abortion (they were only allowed in cases of rape or incest). The defendant was District Attorney Henry Wade. The case went all the way to the Supreme Court, which eventually ruled in favor of McCorvey. The judges concluded that a woman can terminate a pregnancy of her own free will until the fetus becomes viable. They justified their decision by the Fourteenth Amendment, which guarantees the right to privacy. The court decision legalized abortion at the federal level, the states lost the ability to ban them.

A draft Supreme Court decision released by Politico on May 2 said "Roe was completely wrong from the start."

The government plans to increase the percentage of refusals of abortions to 50% Society

“Her reasoning was exceptionally weak and the [court] decision had devastating consequences. The Rowe and Casey cases not only failed to resolve the issue of abortion at the national level, but created controversy and deepened divisions, ”the draft judgment says.

The document states that, in the opinion of the judges, the decisions in both cases should be canceled, since as a result a right arose that was not enshrined in the Constitution.

At the same time, Politico writes that the judges may change their minds - the material of the publication deals only with a draft version. The court decision will not enter into force until its official publication, this may happen in the next two months, the newspaper writes. “The direct result of the ruling, as outlined in the draft, will be to remove the constitutional protection of the right to abortion at the federal level and leave it up to each state to decide whether to restrict or ban abortion,” Politico said.

Pro How to grow even in a crisis. Applying Deming's principles in sales Instructions Pro 4 important lessons of the crisis years for a manager:sanctionscan block IIS due to foreign exchange debt Articles Pro 8 minutes for coffee - a long time:how to calculate the best location for a retail outlet Articles Pro Double-digit inflation and office hostages:April Top 10 Articles Pro Business Connected:How to Answer Tough Customer Questions in a Crisis How To Pro x The Economist The Fed made a historic mistake.Will this lead to a global recession Articles

Putin announced the need to support women who refused abortion Society

After the publication of the article in Washington, a spontaneous protest was formed in front of the Supreme Court, reports Reuters. Representatives of both camps participated in it: supporters of abortion and their opponents.

On September 1, 2021, the state of Texas passed a strict abortion law, also known as the "Heartbeat Law". It prohibits having an abortion after a heartbeat is detected in the fetus, which can occur as early as the sixth week, and allows anyone who facilitated an abortion after that time to be sued. The provisions of the law do not make exceptions even for cases of rape or incest.

The legality of the new rule was challenged and it was temporarily suspended in October 2021. Marches were held in almost all states against the tightening of legislation in Texas. However, the law was reinstated.

Read together with it: